Letendre v. State — Certiorari petition denied without explanation

Case
Clement Allan Letendre v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lucas, C.J.; Khouzam, J.; Morris, J.
Date Decided
September 2, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-0297
Topics
Certiorari; Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Clement Allan Letendre petitioned the Florida Second District Court of Appeal for a writ of certiorari. He sought review of a decision by the Circuit Court for the Sixth Judicial Circuit in Pinellas County, sitting in its appellate capacity.

Letendre represented himself. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, or the arguments supporting the petition.

The Court’s Holding

The Second District denied the petition for writ of certiorari.

The per curiam opinion provided no reasoning or discussion of the governing law. Chief Judge Lucas and Judges Khouzam and Morris concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The petition for writ of certiorari was denied.
  • The requested review concerned a circuit court decision issued in its appellate capacity.
  • The opinion does not disclose the underlying facts or explain the basis for the denial.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s appellate ruling undisturbed. Because the opinion contains no reasoning or factual discussion, it announces no substantive rule beyond the disposition of Letendre’s petition.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top