Lightfoot v. Greiner — Fifth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Marlisheyouna Lightfoot v. Eugene Greiner
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Lambert; Eisnaugle
Date Decided
September 1, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-3320
Topics
Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance; Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Marlisheyouna Lightfoot appealed from the County Court for Duval County, where County Judge Gary P. Flower presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-court case as No. 16-2025-SC-010329.

Lightfoot and appellee Eugene Greiner each represented themselves. The opinion does not describe the dispute, the county court’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no reasoning or explanation for its ruling. Judges Makar, Lambert, and Eisnaugle concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The county court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued no written analysis of the facts or legal issues.
  • Because the opinion does not identify the underlying claims or appellate arguments, no broader substantive holding can be drawn from the disposition.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the county court’s ruling in place but offers no precedential reasoning for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases. Its practical significance is therefore limited to the disposition of this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top