Lindsey v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed the judgment without a written opinion

Case
Dominique Lindsey v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
TRAVER, C.J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); Nardella, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); White, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
October 13, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-2538
Topics
Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance, Florida Law
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Dominique Lindsey appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Orange County in lower-tribunal case number 2016-CF-007257-A-O. Circuit Judge Leticia Marques presided below.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the arguments raised on appeal, or the circuit court’s reasoning.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation for its ruling. Chief Judge Traver and Judges Nardella and White concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment against Lindsey was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the appellate issues or establish a stated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place. Because the appellate court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the legal or factual issues involved in Lindsey’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top