Lopez Gomez v. State — affirmed the judgment without a written opinion

Case
Antonio Ismael Lopez Gomez v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Brownlee; Gannam; Kamoutsas
Date Decided
August 25, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-2769
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Antonio Ismael Lopez Gomez appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court for Lee County, where Circuit Judge Robert Branning presided. The underlying matter was identified as case number 23-CF-017391.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the charges, facts, arguments, or rulings challenged on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Judges Brownlee, Gannam, and Kamoutsas concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The appellate court affirmed the judgment below.
  • The decision was unanimous among the three identified panel judges.
  • The opinion provides no reasoning or discussion of the issues raised on appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place. Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion supplies no substantive analysis for attorneys regarding the underlying legal or factual issues.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top