Lopez v. Florida — Appeal affirmed by court (unpublished order without reasoning)

Case
David Junior Lopez v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Unchecked
Date Decided
July 7, 2026
Docket No.
6D2024-2420
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Affirmance, Pro Se Representation

Background

David Junior Lopez appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court for Orange County (Case No. 2014-CF-010590), where Judge Leticia Marques presided. Lopez, representing himself without counsel, filed this appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The State of Florida, as appellee, made no appearance in the appeal proceedings.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court’s judgment. The court issued no written reasoning or analysis accompanying its decision, consistent with Florida’s practice of unpublished summary affirmances in certain appellate matters. The justices NARDELLA, WOZNIAK, and PRATT concurred in the affirmance.

Key Takeaways

  • The trial court’s judgment was upheld without modification or remand.
  • Pro se appellants are not exempt from appellate standards and procedures.
  • Summary affirmances without written opinion provide limited guidance on the merits or applicable legal principles.

Why It Matters

This bare affirmance establishes no precedent and provides no guidance on the substantive issues that prompted the appeal. The lack of reasoned opinion limits its utility to future litigants and practitioners seeking appellate direction. For Lopez, the affirmance closes the appellate remedy in the trial court matter.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top