Maberry — affirmed the criminal judgment without a written explanation

Case
DaQuinn Vernon Maberry v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
CIKLIN (Charlie Crist, 2008); Conner (Rick Scott, 2011)
Date Decided
July 30, 2026
Docket No.
4D2024-3044
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

DaQuinn Vernon Maberry appealed from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, where Judge Caroline Shepherd presided over the underlying criminal case.

The Fourth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the charges, the proceedings below, Maberry’s arguments on appeal, or the State’s response.

The Court’s Holding

The court affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The opinion provides no legal analysis or explanation for the affirmance. Judges Ciklin, Conner, and Klingensmith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the judgment under review.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written rationale.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s judgment in place. Because the appellate court supplied no facts, reasoning, or statement of law, the opinion offers no articulated legal rule beyond the result in this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top