Malphurs — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Charles J. Malphurs v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lewis; Rowe; Nordby
Date Decided
September 22, 2026
Docket No.
1D2024-2951
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Charles J. Malphurs appealed a matter from the Circuit Court for Leon County, where Circuit Judge James L. Marsh presided. The opinion does not identify the nature of the underlying case, the ruling under review, or the arguments raised on appeal.

Malphurs was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office. The Florida Attorney General’s Office represented the State.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed. Its per curiam opinion contains no explanation of the decision and cites no authority.

Judges Lewis, Rowe, and Nordby concurred. The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the matter on appeal.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the ruling reviewed, or the appellate issues.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal at the First District but supplies no written reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. Because the opinion does not disclose the issues presented or the basis for affirmance, no broader substantive holding can be drawn from it.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top