Marie — Florida appellate court affirmed the judgment without a written explanation

Case
Alexander Jean Marie v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Stargel; Nardella; Wozniak
Date Decided
October 13, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-0503
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Alexander Jean Marie appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Osceola County in lower-tribunal case number 2023-CF-000085. Circuit Judge John D.W. Beamer presided below.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, facts, arguments, or rulings challenged on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision. Judges Stargel, Nardella, and Wozniak concurred.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation for its disposition. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the judgment under review was affirmed and does not identify the grounds for that result.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the judgment of the Osceola County Circuit Court.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by a panel consisting of Judges Stargel, Nardella, and Wozniak.
  • The opinion contains no factual discussion, legal analysis, or explanation of the issues presented.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this stage of the appeal by leaving the circuit court’s judgment in place. Because the court issued an unexplained affirmance, the opinion offers no substantive guidance about the legal questions or facts involved.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top