Marsh v. State — Florida First DCA affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Tommy Marsh v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Roberts; Winokur; Treadwell
Date Decided
September 14, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2503
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Tommy Marsh appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Holmes County, where Judge Russell S. Roberts presided.

The First District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the nature of the circuit court’s ruling, or the arguments Marsh raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning. Judges Roberts, Winokur, and Treadwell concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court provided no written analysis of the facts or legal issues.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no reasoning that attorneys can apply to other cases. The opinion therefore provides no express guidance about the substantive issues presented in Marsh’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top