Martin v. Gonzalez Azcuy — affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation

Case
Dwayne Martin v. Thomas Gonzalez Azcuy
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gross; May; Ciklin
Date Decided
September 24, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-1796
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Dwayne Martin appealed a ruling from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Jeffrey R. Levenson presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 062023CA000478AXXXCE.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Judges Gross, May, and Ciklin concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling was affirmed.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but supplies no written analysis concerning the underlying claims or appellate issues.

Because the opinion states no legal rationale, it offers no substantive guidance beyond the disposition of this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top