Mathis — Fifth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Yolanda Syvaugh Mathis v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Edwards; Boatwright
Date Decided
September 22, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-1376
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Yolanda Syvaugh Mathis appealed in a case originating in the Circuit Court for Duval County, where Circuit Judge Lindsay L. Tygart presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal case number as 16-2022-CF-4181-A.

The short opinion does not describe the charges, facts, arguments, or specific ruling under review. Mathis was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office, and the State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed. Judges Makar, Edwards, and Boatwright concurred in the per curiam decision.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the issues. The opinion also states that it is not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the appeal.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by a three-judge panel.
  • The opinion supplies no facts, legal analysis, or explanation for the result.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves the appeal at the panel stage without a written explanation of the governing law or the court’s reasoning. Because the opinion contains only an affirmance, it offers no substantive analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top