Matthews v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Grier Matthews v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lucas, C.J.; Northcutt, J.; Guard, J.
Date Decided
October 7, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-0627
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Summary Affirmance; Postconviction Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Grier Matthews appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Robin Fernandez Fuson presided.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The Second District’s opinion does not describe Matthews’s claims, the circuit court’s ruling, or the underlying facts.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The per curiam opinion provided no reasoning or analysis. Chief Judge Lucas and Judges Northcutt and Guard concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • The court did not explain its reasoning or address the merits of Matthews’s claims in a written analysis.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no written reasoning for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top