Maxwell v. State — Fourth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Johnathan Maxwell v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
May; Shepherd; Shaw
Date Decided
October 22, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-2651
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Johnathan Maxwell appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County, Judge Peter Holden presiding. The lower-court case number was 062024CF004214A88810.

The Fourth District’s opinion does not identify Maxwell’s underlying offense, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision.

The court provided no written reasoning and cited no authority. Judges May, Shepherd, and Shaw concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the judgment against Maxwell.
  • The decision was a per curiam affirmance without an explanatory opinion.
  • The opinion does not disclose the appellate issues or establish a stated rule of law.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s judgment intact but offers no reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. The decision was designated not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top