McCoy v. Pine Run Operations — Fifth District affirmed the county court’s judgment without a written opinion

Case
William McCoy and Jennifer McCoy v. Pine Run Operations, LLC
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Jay, C.J.; Eisnaugle, J.; MacIver, J.
Date Decided
September 1, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-2339
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

William McCoy and Jennifer McCoy appealed a decision of the County Court for Marion County in their case against Pine Run Operations, LLC. County Judge Lori Cotton presided over the lower-court matter, docketed as 2024-CC-000588.

The appellate opinion does not describe the parties’ dispute, the claims asserted, the county court’s reasoning, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no written analysis or explanation of its reasoning. Chief Judge Jay and Judges Eisnaugle and MacIver concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District left the county court’s decision in place.
  • The disposition was a per curiam affirmance without a written opinion.
  • The opinion establishes no stated rationale concerning the underlying dispute or appellate issues.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends this appeal in Pine Run Operations’ favor by preserving the result reached in county court, subject to any timely and authorized post-decision motion under the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Because the court issued only an unexplained affirmance, the opinion offers practitioners no substantive guidance on the underlying legal questions.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top