McCray v. State — Affirmed denial of postconviction relief without explanation

Case
Moses Anthony McCray v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gerber, C.J. (Charlie Crist, 2009); May, J. (Jeb Bush, 2002); Klingensmith, J. (Rick Scott, 2013)
Date Decided
September 17, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-1188
Topics
Criminal Law; Postconviction Relief; Rule 3.850
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Moses Anthony McCray appealed an order denying his motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The order came from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, with Judge Howard Coates, Jr. presiding.

McCray represented himself on appeal. The Fourth District stated that no appearance was required for the State.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the order denying McCray’s Rule 3.850 motion.

The per curiam opinion supplied no reasoning, discussed no claims, and announced no rule of law. It therefore establishes only that the challenged order was affirmed, without revealing the panel’s grounds.

Key Takeaways

  • The denial of McCray’s Rule 3.850 motion was affirmed.
  • The appellate court did not explain its reasoning or address the substance of McCray’s claims.
  • Chief Judge Gerber and Judges May and Klingensmith concurred in the per curiam disposition.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal with the postconviction order left in place, subject to disposition of any timely motion for rehearing. Because the opinion contains no analysis, it offers no substantive guidance on Rule 3.850 standards or the merits of McCray’s claims.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top