McDaniels v. Clarke — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Stanley McDaniels v. James Clarke
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Kelsey; Long; Treadwell
Date Decided
September 30, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-1730
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Stanley McDaniels, proceeding without counsel, appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Circuit Judge Randall T. Harris entered the decision under review, and James Clarke was the appellee.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion. Judges Kelsey, Long, and Treadwell concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. The opinion therefore establishes only that the judgment or order under review was affirmed.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the Escambia County circuit court’s decision.
  • The ruling was a unanimous per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the underlying facts, appellate issues, or legal rationale.

Why It Matters

The decision ends the appeal in Clarke’s favor unless altered through an authorized post-decision motion or further review. Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the legal issues that may have been presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top