McDermott v. Rojas-Glad — Fifth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Anthony McDermott, Jr. v. Laura Rojas-Glad and Nancy Rojas
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
JAY, C.J. (Ron DeSantis, 2023); Lambert, J. (Rick Scott, 2014); MacIver, J. (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
October 27, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-2758
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Anthony McDermott, Jr. appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Volusia County in litigation against Laura Rojas-Glad and Nancy Rojas. Circuit Judge Dennis P. Craig presided over the underlying case.

The appellate opinion does not describe the dispute, the trial court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments. The appellees did not appear in the appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the legal issues. Chief Judge Jay and Judges Lambert and MacIver concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The per curiam opinion did not explain the court’s reasoning or identify the issues presented.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place. Because the appellate court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion supplies no stated rule of law or substantive guidance about the underlying dispute.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top