McKenna — affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation

Case
Kenneth David McKenna v. Samantha Renee McKenna
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
ROBERTS (Charlie Crist, 2007); WINOKUR (Rick Scott, 2015)
Date Decided
July 15, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-3122
Topics
Family Law; Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Kenneth David McKenna appealed an order of the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County in a case involving Samantha Renee McKenna. Circuit Judge Darlene Fallon Dickey entered the order under review.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the terms of the circuit court’s order, the arguments raised on appeal, or the applicable law. Counsel appeared for the appellant; no appearance was entered for the appellee.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Accordingly, the opinion identifies no specific legal issue, reasoning, or rule supporting the result.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s order was affirmed.
  • The appellate court provided no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The decision was per curiam, with Judges Roberts, Winokur, and Treadwell concurring.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place, subject to disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion offers no articulated legal reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top