McKinley — affirmed the criminal judgment without a written opinion

Case
Karron Lee McKinley v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Nardella; Brownlee; Kamoutsas
Date Decided
September 15, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1736
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Karron Lee McKinley appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Polk County, where Circuit Judge Jalal A. Harb presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal case as No. 2023-CF-002759.

The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the charges, procedural history, appellate arguments, or facts underlying the case.

The Court’s Holding

The court affirmed the circuit court’s judgment in a per curiam decision. Judges Nardella, Brownlee, and Kamoutsas concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented. Accordingly, the opinion establishes only that the judgment under review was affirmed; it does not identify the grounds for affirmance or announce a legal rule.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the judgment entered against McKinley.
  • The decision was issued per curiam without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not disclose the facts, appellate issues, or legal basis for the result.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the lower court’s judgment intact. Because the appellate court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the legal issues that may have been raised.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top