Medley v. State of Florida — First District Court of Appeal affirms without stated reasoning

Case
Demari Medley v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Date Decided
June 22, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2033
Topics
Appellate Review, Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Demari Medley appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Alachua County, Judge James M. Colaw presiding. Medley was proceeding pro se. The appellate opinion provides no factual background or description of the underlying proceedings or claims at issue.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Circuit Court’s decision. The affirmance was unanimous, with all three judges on the panel concurring. However, the court issued no written reasoning, analysis of the legal issues, or explanation of its grounds for affirmation.

Key Takeaways

  • The lower court’s judgment was upheld on appeal
  • No appellate reasoning was published with this decision
  • The affirmance was unanimous

Why It Matters

As a summary affirmance without reasoned opinion, this decision provides limited guidance to practitioners. The lack of written reasoning means the decision creates no new precedent and does not clarify the legal standards or fact patterns the appellate court considered dispositive in affirming the lower court.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top