Mendez Gudino — Florida’s Sixth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Neidy Caridad Mendez Gudino v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
White; Brownlee; Gannam
Date Decided
November 3, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1706
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Appellate Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Neidy Caridad Mendez Gudino appealed from the Circuit Court for Polk County, where Circuit Judge Michelle O. Pincket presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal case as No. 2020-CF-000392.

The Sixth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying facts, the specific ruling under review, the issues Gudino raised, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed in a per curiam decision. Judges White, Brownlee, and Gannam concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or legal analysis and did not identify the particular order or other ruling being affirmed.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the matter on appeal.
  • The decision was unanimous among the three identified panel members.
  • Because the opinion contains only an affirmance, it supplies no explanation of the governing law or the court’s reasoning.

Why It Matters

The disposition ends the appeal in the Sixth District unless further review or rehearing is sought and available. Its practical significance is case-specific because the opinion does not discuss the facts, issues, or legal basis for affirmance.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top