Mendez v. Mata — Appellate court affirmed lower court decision without written opinion

Case
Suali Luz Mendez v. David Juan Mata
Court
Sixth District Court of Appeal, State of Florida
Judge
WOZNIAK (Ron DeSantis, 2023); SMITH (Ron DeSantis, 2022)
Date Decided
July 10, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1981
Topics
Family Law, Appellate Procedure, Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Suali Luz Mendez appealed a decision from the Circuit Court for Collier County, where Judge Christopher H. Brown presided over a domestic relations matter with docket number 2022-DR-000560. Both parties appeared pro se, representing themselves without counsel.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the lower court’s decision without issuing a written opinion, citing Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). This rule permits appellate courts to affirm judgments summarily when no substantial question is presented. The court’s three-judge panel—WOZNIAK, SMITH, and BROWNLEE, JJ.—unanimously concurred in the affirmance.

Key Takeaways

  • The lower court’s judgment was upheld on appeal.
  • No written explanation of the appellate reasoning was issued.
  • The decision is not final until the time period for filing a motion for rehearing expires.

Why It Matters

Appellate affirmances without written opinion are common when the appellate court finds the lower court’s decision sound and no novel legal issues require discussion. However, for pro se litigants, such affirmances provide no guidance on the court’s reasoning or specific grounds for rejection of any arguments raised on appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top