Mendoza v. Automotion Auto Repair — Sixth District summarily affirmed the county court

Case
Monceny Mendoza v. Automotion Auto Repair
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Wozniak; Mize; Brownlee
Date Decided
September 1, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-2889
Topics
Appeals, Summary Affirmance, Small Claims
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Monceny Mendoza, proceeding without counsel, appealed a decision of the County Court for Lee County in lower-tribunal case number 2025-SC-009028. County Judge Lindsay S. Garza presided below.

The appellate court’s brief opinion does not describe the parties’ underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, or Mendoza’s arguments on appeal. Automotion Auto Repair did not appear in the appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision.

The per curiam opinion provided no reasoning or analysis. Judges Wozniak, Mize, and Brownlee concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District left the county court’s judgment in place.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation.
  • The opinion discloses neither the underlying facts nor the legal issues presented on appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision ends Mendoza’s appeal unless further relief is timely sought and available. Because the court supplied no reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the legal issues underlying the case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top