Miller — Fifth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Melodie Miller v. Department of Corrections
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Makar; Eisnaugle; Soud
Date Decided
October 6, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0515
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Melodie Miller, proceeding pro se, appealed from the Circuit Court for Marion County in lower-tribunal case number 42-2026-CA-196. Circuit Judge Robert W. Hodges entered the ruling under review.

The appellee was the Department of Corrections. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the arguments on appeal, or the relief Miller sought.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. Judges Makar, Eisnaugle, and Soud concurred in the per curiam disposition.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the facts or law. The opinion therefore establishes only that the judgment under review was affirmed; it does not identify the grounds for affirmance.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by Judges Makar, Eisnaugle, and Soud.
  • The opinion contains no factual account, legal analysis, or explanation for the result.

Why It Matters

The disposition leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no articulated legal rule or reasoning for attorneys to apply in other cases. Any broader characterization of the dispute or the basis for affirmance would go beyond the opinion’s text.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top