Mitchell — affirmed the criminal judgment without a written opinion

Case
Micheal Mitchell v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gross; May; Ciklin
Date Decided
October 1, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-0903
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Micheal Mitchell appealed from a judgment of the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County, where Judge George Odom, Jr. presided.

The Fourth District’s disposition does not describe the charges, underlying facts, issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Judges Gross, May, and Ciklin concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s judgment remains in place.
  • The appellate court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends the appeal in the State’s favor unless further review or rehearing alters the result. Because the court issued an unexplained per curiam affirmance, the opinion supplies no substantive guidance on the legal issues involved.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top