Mitchell — Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling

Case
James J. Mitchell v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Per Curiam
Date Decided
October 14, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-2027
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance, Florida Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

James J. Mitchell appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Michelle Sisco presided. Mitchell represented himself on appeal.

The appeal proceeded pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The opinion does not describe Mitchell’s claims, the circuit court’s reasoning, or the specific nature of the ruling under review.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no explanation for its decision. Judges LaRose, Sleet, and Guard concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The court issued its decision per curiam and without a written analysis.
  • The opinion does not identify the issues raised or explain the basis for affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place. Because the appellate court supplied no reasoning or factual discussion, the opinion offers no substantive guidance beyond the result in Mitchell’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top