Moore v. State — Florida Second District affirmed the circuit court’s decision

Case
Bryce Deion Moore v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Northcutt; Khouzam; Sleet
Date Decided
August 26, 2026
Docket No.
2D2024-2916
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Rule 9.141(b)(2); Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Bryce Deion Moore appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Philip J. Federico presided.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The appellate opinion provides no additional facts, arguments, or description of the circuit court’s ruling.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam disposition without explaining its reasoning. Judges Northcutt, Khouzam, and Sleet concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • The opinion contains no factual discussion or legal analysis.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place. Because the opinion offers no reasoning, it does not reveal which arguments Moore raised or the appellate court’s basis for rejecting them.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top