Mullen v. Woody — Florida appeals court affirmed the county court’s judgment without an opinion

Case
Travis Mullen v. John Woody
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Nardella; White; Gannam
Date Decided
October 27, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1906
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Travis Mullen appealed from a decision of the County Court for Orange County in lower-tribunal case number 2024-CC-019228-O. County Judge David P. Johnson presided below, and John Woody was the appellee.

The appellate court’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s judgment in a per curiam decision. Judges Nardella, White, and Gannam concurred.

The court provided no written reasoning or legal analysis. The opinion therefore establishes only that the judgment under review was affirmed, without identifying the grounds for that result.

Key Takeaways

  • The Sixth District affirmed the Orange County Court’s judgment.
  • The disposition was unanimous among Judges Nardella, White, and Gannam.
  • Because the court issued a one-word affirmance without analysis, the opinion does not explain the controlling facts, legal issues, or rationale.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the county court’s judgment in place. Its broader significance is limited because the appellate court did not provide an explanation that attorneys could apply to other disputes.

The opinion was designated not final until the time to seek rehearing expires and any timely rehearing motion is resolved.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top