Murrell v. State — affirmed the circuit court’s ruling without a written opinion

Case
David Julian Murrell v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Wallis; Eisnaugle; Boatwright
Date Decided
August 18, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0872
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

David Julian Murrell, proceeding pro se, appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for Citrus County in lower-court case number 09-2021-CF-1408-A. Circuit Judge Joel D. Fritton entered the ruling under review.

The State of Florida appeared through the Attorney General’s Office. The appellate court’s brief opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the ruling challenged, Murrell’s arguments, or the State’s response.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling. Judges Wallis, Eisnaugle, and Boatwright concurred in the per curiam disposition.

The court issued no written analysis and identified no legal ground for affirmance. The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was a unanimous per curiam affirmance without an explanatory opinion.
  • The opinion supplies no facts or legal reasoning from which a narrower substantive holding can be derived.

Why It Matters

The disposition ends the appeal in the State’s favor, subject to any timely and authorized post-decision motion. Because the court provided no analysis, the opinion offers no guidance on the merits beyond the affirmance itself.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top