Muszik v. Town of Redington Shores — Appeal dismissed without explanation

Case
Carol Muszik v. Town of Redington Shores, Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lucas, C.J.; Labrit, J.; Guard, J.
Date Decided
September 18, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-0228
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Dismissal
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Carol Muszik appealed from a ruling of the Circuit Court for Pinellas County, where Judge Amy S. Williams presided. The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130, which governs appeals from specified nonfinal orders.

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal’s brief opinion does not identify the underlying dispute, describe the circuit court’s ruling, or state the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Second District dismissed the appeal.

The per curiam opinion provides no reasoning and does not state whether the dismissal resulted from lack of appellate jurisdiction, mootness, a procedural defect, or another ground. Accordingly, it establishes no stated merits holding beyond dismissal of this appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District dismissed Muszik’s appeal.
  • The appeal was brought under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130.
  • The opinion supplies no factual discussion or explanation for the dismissal.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appellate proceeding without a stated ruling on the merits. Because the court gave no rationale, practitioners should not infer a particular jurisdictional or procedural rule from the dismissal alone.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top