Navarro — Fifth District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Geremy Doel Navarro v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Eisnaugle; Soud; MacIver
Date Decided
November 3, 2026
Docket No.
5D2024-3352
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Geremy Doel Navarro appealed from a proceeding in the Circuit Court for Marion County, where Judge Lisa Diane Herndon presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-court case as 2023-CF-001251-A.

The opinion provides no facts, procedural history, issues presented, or description of the ruling under review. Navarro was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office, and the State was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed in a per curiam decision.

The court offered no reasoning and did not identify the legal grounds for affirmance. Judges Eisnaugle, Soud, and MacIver concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the matter under review.
  • The decision was per curiam and contained no written legal analysis.
  • The opinion does not disclose the facts, appellate arguments, or nature of the ruling being reviewed.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling undisturbed but supplies no explanation that attorneys can apply to other cases. Any assessment of the underlying issues would require review of the briefs and lower-court record.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top