Oglesby v. Bonilla — Fourth District summarily affirmed the county court

Case
RaeJean Oglesby and Dicky Theron Thomas v. Alexander Bonilla
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
May; Klingensmith; Lott
Date Decided
October 8, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-0938
Topics
Appeals, Summary Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

RaeJean Oglesby and Dicky Theron Thomas appealed from a decision of the County Court for Florida’s Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County. County Court Judge Reginald Corlew presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 502026CC003208XXXASB.

Oglesby and Thomas represented themselves on appeal. Alexander Bonilla made no appearance. The appellate court’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues. Judges May, Klingensmith, and Lott concurred in the disposition.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the county court’s decision.
  • The per curiam opinion did not identify the issues presented or explain the court’s reasoning.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the county court’s ruling in place. Because the opinion contains only a summary affirmance and no legal analysis, it offers no explanation of the governing law or how the court evaluated the appellants’ claims.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top