O’Neal v. Brevard County — Fifth District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Katie O’Neal v. Brevard County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
JAY (Ron DeSantis, 2023); LAMBERT (Rick Scott, 2014)
Date Decided
July 21, 2026
Docket No.
5D2026-0298
Topics
Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Katie O’Neal appealed a decision of the County Court for Brevard County, where Judge Jonathan Skinner presided. Brevard County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, was the appellee.

The Fifth District’s opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, the arguments on appeal, or the applicable law.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Accordingly, the opinion states no legal reasoning or narrower substantive holding beyond leaving the lower court’s judgment in place.

Key Takeaways

  • The county court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court provided no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • Chief Judge Jay and Judges Lambert and Harris concurred in the disposition.

Why It Matters

The ruling ends this stage of the appeal with the county court’s judgment intact, subject to disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Because the court did not explain its reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance about the underlying dispute or the legal issues presented.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top