Ortiz — affirmed the nursing-board decision without a written explanation

Case
Jorge Humberto Ortiz v. Department of Health
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
OSTERHAUS (Rick Scott, 2013); LEWIS (Jeb Bush, 2001)
Date Decided
August 11, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2684
Topics
Administrative Appeals, Professional Licensing, Nursing
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jorge Humberto Ortiz appealed a decision of the Florida Department of Health, Board of Nursing, to the Florida First District Court of Appeal.

The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the Board’s ruling, Ortiz’s arguments, or the relief he sought on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The First District affirmed the Board of Nursing’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation, so the opinion states no reasoning and establishes no express rule beyond the disposition of this appeal. Chief Judge Osterhaus and Judges Lewis and Bilbrey concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Board of Nursing’s decision remains in effect.
  • The appellate court provided no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The opinion was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Ortiz’s appeal in the Department’s favor but offers no guidance about the governing law or the court’s reasons. Attorneys should consult the administrative record and briefing for the facts, issues, and arguments not included in the opinion.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top