Oulton v. State — Fourth District affirms without a written explanation

Case
Robert Oulton v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Gerber, C.J. (Charlie Crist, 2009); Levine, J. (Charlie Crist, 2009); CONNER, J. (Rick Scott, 2011)
Date Decided
September 10, 2026
Docket No.
4D2026-0209
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Robert Oulton, proceeding pro se, appealed from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County. Circuit Judge Ernest A. Kollra, Jr. presided over the underlying case, docketed as No. 062010CF006118A88810.

The State was represented on appeal by Attorney General James Uthmeier and Senior Assistant Attorney General Heidi L. Bettendorf. The appellate court’s brief opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the order being reviewed, the parties’ arguments, or the procedural basis for the appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion. Chief Judge Gerber and Judges Levine and Conner concurred.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented. The opinion therefore establishes only that the lower court’s ruling was affirmed; it does not announce a substantive legal rule or disclose the grounds for the decision.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fourth District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by a three-judge panel consisting of Chief Judge Gerber and Judges Levine and Conner.
  • The opinion contains no factual discussion, legal analysis, or explanation for the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place. Because the appellate court did not explain its reasoning, the opinion offers no substantive guidance on the underlying legal issues.

The decision was not final until disposition of any timely filed motion for rehearing.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top