Outlaw v. State — Florida appeals court affirmed without explanation

Case
Demetrius Outlaw v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lucas, C.J.; Northcutt, J.; Smith, J.
Date Decided
October 21, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-0802
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Summary Affirmance; Pro Se Litigation
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Demetrius Outlaw appealed from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Michelle Sisco presided. Outlaw represented himself on appeal.

The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2). The brief opinion does not describe the underlying ruling, Outlaw’s arguments, or the State’s position.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam disposition without explaining its reasoning or addressing any legal issue. Chief Judge Lucas and Judges Northcutt and Smith concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Second District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The appeal proceeded under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).
  • The opinion provides no facts, legal analysis, or explanation for the affirmance.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal with the circuit court’s ruling intact. Because the appellate court supplied no reasoning or description of the issues, the opinion offers no substantive legal analysis for application in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top