Owens — Court issued a per curiam opinion without stating a disposition

Case
Joseph Stanley Jerez Owens v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Stargel; Wozniak; Gannam
Date Decided
September 29, 2026
Docket No.
6D2025-1622
Topics
Criminal Appeal; Per Curiam Opinion
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Joseph Stanley Jerez Owens appealed from a decision of the Circuit Court for Lee County in lower-tribunal case number 2024-CF-016123. Circuit Judge Andrew Marcus presided below.

The opinion identifies Owens as the appellant and the State of Florida as the appellee, but provides no facts, procedural history, claims, or arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Sixth District Court of Appeal issued a per curiam opinion. Judges Stargel, Wozniak, and Gannam concurred.

The supplied opinion text does not state a disposition or explain any legal ruling. It therefore provides no basis to characterize the result as an affirmance, reversal, dismissal, or other specific action.

Key Takeaways

  • The court issued its opinion per curiam, without identifying an individual author.
  • The participating panel consisted of Judges Stargel, Wozniak, and Gannam.
  • The opinion contains no factual discussion, legal analysis, or express disposition.

Why It Matters

Because the opinion gives no reasoning or stated disposition, it supplies no articulated rule of law or guidance for future cases. Any account of the underlying dispute or appellate outcome would require material beyond the supplied opinion text.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top