Parajon — workers’ compensation ruling affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Surama Allende Parajon, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ramon Aguiar v. American Airlines and Sedgwick CMS
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
ROBERTS (Charlie Crist, 2007); Rowe (Charlie Crist, 2009)
Date Decided
July 16, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-2023
Topics
Workers’ Compensation, Per Curiam Affirmance, Appellate Review
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Surama Allende Parajon, as personal representative of the Estate of Ramon Aguiar, appealed an order from the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims. American Airlines and Sedgwick CMS were the appellees.

The opinion identifies Edward R. Almeyda as the compensation claims judge and lists accident dates of January 27, 2011; September 30, 2012; and September 13, 2023. It provides no further facts, procedural history, or description of the claims and defenses.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the ruling below in a per curiam decision. Judges Roberts, Rowe, and Kelsey concurred.

Because the court issued only an unelaborated affirmance, the opinion states no legal reasoning and does not identify the specific issues decided on appeal.

Key Takeaways

  • The order from the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims remains undisturbed.
  • The appellate court affirmed without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion provides no factual or legal analysis from which a broader holding can be drawn.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves this appeal in favor of American Airlines and Sedgwick CMS, subject to disposition of any timely and authorized rehearing or related motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Because the court gave no reasons for affirmance, practitioners should not treat the decision as announcing a substantive rule concerning workers’ compensation law or the listed accident dates.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top