Partridge v. State — Fifth District affirms without a written explanation

Case
Issac Partridge v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
Eisnaugle; Harris; Kilbane
Date Decided
September 10, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-0497
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Issac Partridge appealed from the Circuit Court for Duval County, where Judge London Kite presided. The Fifth District identified the lower-tribunal case as No. 2022-CF-008263-A.

The appellate opinion provides no facts, claims, arguments, or description of the particular ruling under review.

The Court’s Holding

The Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed in a per curiam decision.

The court supplied no reasoning or legal analysis. Judges Eisnaugle, Harris, and Kilbane concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation.
  • The opinion does not identify the issues presented or the basis for affirmance.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The disposition resolves Partridge’s appeal in the State’s favor at the Fifth District, subject to the court’s stated finality condition.

Because the opinion contains only a bare affirmance, it offers no substantive guidance about the underlying facts or legal questions.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top