Passmore v. State — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Elijah Passmore v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Roberts; Bilbrey; Nordby
Date Decided
October 16, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-1161
Topics
Criminal Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Elijah Passmore, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Leon County, where Circuit Judge J. Lee Marsh presided.

The First District’s opinion does not describe the underlying charges, the circuit court’s ruling, Passmore’s appellate arguments, or the State’s response.

The Court’s Holding

The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning or resolving any legal issue in a written analysis. Judges Roberts, Bilbrey, and Nordby concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The appellate court provided no factual discussion or legal analysis.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no written reasoning for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top