Patterson v. Florida — Fourth District affirmed the trial court’s decision

Case
David Patterson v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal
Date Decided
July 2, 2026
Docket No.
4D2025-0661
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Per Curiam Affirmance, Trial Court Judgment
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

David Patterson appealed a judgment from the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County, where Judge Michael Rothschild presided over trial case number 062023CF001258A88810. The case proceeded through the appellate process and was heard by the Fourth District Court of Appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Fourth District Court of Appeal issued a per curiam opinion affirming the trial court’s judgment without written explanation. Three judges concurred in the decision. The affirmance preserves the lower court’s ruling as the controlling judgment in the case.

Key Takeaways

  • The trial court’s judgment stands and is affirmed on appeal
  • This was an affirmance without opinion, providing no written reasoning or guidance on legal issues
  • The decision is not yet final; it remains subject to disposition of any timely-filed motion for rehearing

Why It Matters

Per curiam affirmances without written opinion uphold lower court decisions but shed no light on the appellate court’s reasoning or the specific legal questions at issue. This limits precedential value and guidance for future litigants facing similar issues.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top