Background
Clarence Thomas Pelham appealed from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County, where Circuit Judge Shannon H. McFee presided. The appellate opinion identifies the lower-tribunal proceeding as case number 2024-CF-000362.
The Sixth District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the facts, the issues Pelham raised, or the specific ruling under review.
The Court’s Holding
The court affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation. Judges Wozniak, Smith, and Pratt concurred in the per curiam decision.
Because the opinion consists solely of the disposition, it provides no legal reasoning, factual analysis, or express ruling on any particular issue.
Key Takeaways
- The Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed the unidentified ruling under review.
- The three-judge panel issued the decision per curiam and unanimously concurred.
- The opinion does not disclose the facts, appellate arguments, or grounds for affirmance.
Why It Matters
The decision resolves Pelham’s appeal in favor of the State but offers no written analysis for attorneys to apply in other cases. Its significance is therefore limited to the disposition of this appeal.