Peters v. State — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Jeremie Odell Peters v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
ROBERTS (Charlie Crist, 2007); NORDBY (Ron DeSantis, 2019)
Date Decided
August 5, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0228
Topics
Per Curiam, Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Jeremie Odell Peters, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Holmes County, where Judge Russell S. Roberts presided. The State of Florida was the appellee.

The opinion does not identify the underlying judgment or order, describe the facts, or state the issues Peters raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam opinion consisting only of the disposition “AFFIRMED.” It provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Judges Roberts, Nordby, and Neff concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s decision.
  • The court did not explain the factual or legal basis for its ruling.
  • The decision was not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Peters’s appeal in the State’s favor but supplies no written analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases. Because the opinion does not disclose the underlying issues, its significance is limited to the disposition of this appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top