Pineiro v. Publix — Fifth District affirmed the judgment without a written opinion

Case
Ada Luz Pineiro v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.
Court
Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal
Judge
JAY (Ron DeSantis, 2023); LAMBERT (Rick Scott, 2014)
Date Decided
July 21, 2026
Docket No.
5D2025-0127
Topics
Civil Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Ada Luz Pineiro appealed a ruling of the Circuit Court for Volusia County in her case against Publix Super Markets, Inc. Circuit Judge Randell H. Rowe, III, presided over the trial-court proceedings.

The appellate court’s decision does not describe the underlying dispute, the trial court’s ruling, the issues Pineiro raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s judgment.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation. Chief Judge Jay and Judges Lambert and MacIver concurred. The decision remains subject to disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.330 or 9.331.

Key Takeaways

  • The Fifth District left the trial court’s judgment in place.
  • The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the issues presented.
  • Because the opinion contains no facts or legal analysis, it does not identify any broader rule applied to the dispute.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Pineiro’s appeal in Publix’s favor, subject to any authorized post-decision motion. Its practical significance is limited to affirmance of the judgment because the court did not issue an explanatory opinion.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top