Piyevsky v. Weissman — affirmed the county court without a written explanation

Case
Ellen Piyevsky v. Jason Weissman and Tanya Weissman
Court
Florida Third District Court of Appeal
Judge
Thomas Logue; Norma S. Lindsey; Fleur J. Lobree Gooden
Date Decided
September 24, 2026
Docket No.
3D24-0222; 3D24-2112
Topics
Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Ellen Piyevsky appealed, and Jason Weissman and Tanya Weissman cross-appealed, from a decision of the County Court for Miami-Dade County. County Court Judge Linda Singer Stein presided below.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the county court’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal and cross-appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the county court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam affirmance without a written explanation, so the opinion states no legal reasoning and identifies no particular issue as the basis for affirmance.

Key Takeaways

  • The county court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The ruling resolved both the appeal and the cross-appeal.
  • The court provided no written analysis of the facts or legal issues.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the county court’s ruling in place, but its summary nature provides no explanation of the appellate court’s reasoning or guidance on the underlying legal questions.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top