Player v. State of Florida — First District affirmed without a written explanation

Case
Marques Isaiah Player v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Lewis; Ray; M.K. THOMAS (Rick Scott, 2016)
Date Decided
October 15, 2026
Docket No.
1D2025-3431
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Marques Isaiah Player appealed from the Circuit Court for Bay County, where Circuit Judge Brantley S. Clark, Jr., presided. The opinion does not identify the nature of the underlying charges, the ruling challenged on appeal, or the arguments raised by Player.

Player was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office. The Florida Attorney General’s Office represented the State.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s ruling. Judges Lewis, Ray, and M.K. Thomas concurred in the per curiam decision.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the facts, legal issues, or applicable law. The opinion therefore establishes only that the appealed ruling was affirmed.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District affirmed the circuit court’s ruling.
  • The decision was issued per curiam by a three-judge panel consisting of Judges Lewis, Ray, and M.K. Thomas.
  • The opinion contains no factual summary, legal analysis, or explanation for the disposition.

Why It Matters

The decision leaves the circuit court’s ruling in place but offers no written guidance on the legal issues presented. Because the opinion does not disclose the underlying facts or reasoning, its significance is limited to the disposition of Player’s appeal.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top