Pleas — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Pythis Pleas v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Rowe, J.; Bilbrey, J.; Treadwell, J.
Date Decided
September 23, 2026
Docket No.
1D2026-0664
Topics
Appeals; Per Curiam Affirmance; Florida Procedure
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Pythis Pleas, proceeding without counsel, appealed from the Circuit Court for Leon County, where Judge Lance E. Neff presided.

The First District Court of Appeal’s opinion does not describe the underlying claims, the circuit court’s ruling, or the arguments raised on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The First District affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam disposition.

The court provided no written reasoning or discussion of the issues. Judges Rowe, Bilbrey, and Treadwell concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s ruling remains in effect.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not identify the substantive issues presented on appeal.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Pleas’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no substantive analysis for attorneys or lower courts to apply in other cases.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top