Plute v. State — Florida appellate court affirmed the circuit court’s decision

Case
Frank Charles Plute v. State of Florida
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Morris; Black; Guard
Date Decided
September 16, 2026
Docket No.
2D2026-0539
Topics
Appellate Procedure, Criminal Appeals, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Frank Charles Plute appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Michelle Sisco presided. The appeal proceeded pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).

The Second District’s opinion does not describe the underlying claims, the circuit court’s reasoning, or the arguments presented on appeal.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision.

The court issued a per curiam opinion without explaining its reasoning. Judges Morris, Black, and Guard concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision was affirmed.
  • The appellate court provided no factual or legal analysis.
  • The opinion identifies the appeal as proceeding under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2).

Why It Matters

The ruling leaves the circuit court’s decision in place. Because the opinion consists only of an affirmance, it does not disclose the issues presented or explain the basis for the appellate court’s decision.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top