Posey v. State — First District affirmed without a written opinion

Case
Rashawn Lamar Posey v. State of Florida
Court
Florida First District Court of Appeal
Judge
Rowe; Winokur; M.K. THOMAS (Rick Scott, 2016)
Date Decided
August 28, 2026
Docket No.
1D2024-3078
Topics
Criminal Appeal, Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Rashawn Lamar Posey appealed from a judgment or order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County, where Judge John F. Simon, Jr. presided. The appellate opinion does not identify the charges, the ruling challenged, or Posey’s arguments on appeal.

Posey was represented on appeal by the Public Defender’s Office. The State of Florida was represented by the Attorney General’s Office.

The Court’s Holding

The Florida First District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision. The court issued a per curiam affirmance consisting only of the word “AFFIRMED.”

Because the court provided no analysis, the opinion states no legal rationale and does not disclose which arguments the panel considered or rejected. Judges Rowe, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The First District left the Escambia County circuit court’s decision in place.
  • The court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion supplies no facts, issues, or legal analysis from which a broader holding can be drawn.

Why It Matters

The decision resolves Posey’s appeal in the State’s favor but offers no written guidance for other litigants or courts. Its significance is therefore limited to the affirmance of the judgment or order under review.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top