Precision Orthopedics v. Zimmer US — affirmed the circuit court without a written explanation

Case
Precision Orthopedics, Inc. v. Zimmer US, Inc. d/b/a Zimmer Biomet; Medtech Southeast, Inc.; and Orthopedics, Inc.
Court
Florida Second District Court of Appeal
Judge
Black; Sleet; Atkinson
Date Decided
August 28, 2026
Docket No.
2D2025-1278
Topics
Appellate Procedure; Per Curiam Affirmance
Source
Read the full opinion

Background

Precision Orthopedics, Inc. appealed a decision of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, where Judge Darren Farfante presided. The appellees were Zimmer US, Inc., doing business as Zimmer Biomet; Medtech Southeast, Inc.; and Orthopedics, Inc.

The appellate opinion does not describe the underlying dispute, the circuit court’s ruling, the issues raised on appeal, or the parties’ arguments. Zimmer US appeared through counsel; the remaining appellees made no appearance.

The Court’s Holding

The Second District Court of Appeal affirmed the circuit court’s decision in a per curiam opinion.

The court provided no reasoning or discussion of the merits. Judges Black, Sleet, and Atkinson concurred.

Key Takeaways

  • The circuit court’s decision remains in effect.
  • The appellate court issued a per curiam affirmance without explaining its reasoning.
  • The opinion does not establish the facts, legal issues, or rationale underlying the disposition.

Why It Matters

The decision ends this appeal with an affirmance, but its lack of analysis limits its usefulness to attorneys seeking guidance on the substantive law. The opinion should not be read as resolving any particular legal question beyond the disposition of this case.

✉️ Get tomorrow’s cases before your first coffee
Daily Case Law is our free morning digest — the most substantive new decisions, filtered to your jurisdictions and topics, each linking back here for the full analysis.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top